some time ago i began a modification of the CORE especially thought for DIY home etching, that is with wider tracks, bigger pads and smaller holes… i messed around with Eagle and eventually never finished the project, nevermind i have a bunch of unfinished projects..
Now that i moved back to the countryside and i need a way to spend my nights i decided to take back this project but to redraw the whole thing in Kicad.
Kicad is an “almost” (currently available for Windows and Linux and possibly for Mac as well if you can compile) cross platform tool for creating schematics, pcbs, Gerber files and much more.
Why Kicad? cause it s free and open source, that was enough to push me to learn how to use it and it took just an evening to draw the entire core and learn the program, but i am smart you know..
Is Kicad better than Eagle? There are pros and cons but i think that now that i ve made the move i ll stick to it from now on.
So here is the schematic of the Core (i have to admit i had some problems to get a decent render but this should be enough..)
Please check it out and tell me if you can spot any error
EDIT:
Error 1: +5v and GND connection in the supply schematic missing
Yep, I second that. The more I use kicad, the more I find myself enjoying it. And I can make CS panels (big ones) without being a dirty lowdown thief ;D
(yeh, I said it. (sometimes I think that should be my signature))
A few guys have tried it and we’re yet to come up with any complaints aside from “this doesn’t work like it does in eagle”. If anyone wants to jump on the kicad train give me a shout in the chatroom.
Due to said space constraints, there’s a chance the audio matrix boards will wind up being in kicad too … And my SRAM board is done in kicad. I’m a fan.
Cimo one thing was suggested - make the ground ‘arrows’ point down and the +5V point up
I started and quited learning eagle few times by now. It was most boring and less intuitive software that I tried. After I stuck, I usually lost a will to continue.
So, as I am still looking for some user friendly PCB software I would like to know do you find Kicad more intuitive and simpler to learn than eagle? Also, could you do things like change the pad dimensions without changing the part in library?
I would like to know do you find Kicad more intuitive and simpler to learn than eagle?
I think it’s a personal thing, but yes, I found kicad to be easier to learn. I had been using eagle for very basic stuff for a couple years, and tried to make a more serious design, worked with eagle for a couple weeks, and got stuck a few times… When I ran out of room on the board, I stole Eagle for a day or two, and when my guilty conscience caught up with me, I tried kicad… within a week I had it down, and it should be noted that was without the assistance that the chatroom gives for Eagle, I had to figure it out for myself. Now that I’ve done that and Cimo has learned from me, we’re getting a good solid knowledge base.
The guys who have been eagle gurus for awhile had some troubles with the UI differences (like the zooming) but I think that if you start from an equal level on both, Kicad is easier.
…or, just start making your design, and come to the chatroom for help with any questions you have
Also, could you do things like change the pad dimensions without changing the part in library?
Yes this is something I really like about kicad - it separates the components (symbol used in the schematic with pin info) and footprints (physical design), so you can just change the footprint in the PCB editor without any dramas.
I did this with the battery holder on my layout, and I just found another very cheap source with a slightly different footprint, so I’ll be designing a new footprint (Note: that’s WAY nicer in kicad) and replacing the existing one.
Heh, I think that says a lot… Cimo has only been using kicad for a little while less than me, juts a few weeks… I figured I’d tell you guys about that when you were already familiar with it; and you were ready, and found it by yourself already!
werks the same as eeschema for me (snaps cursor to centre and zooms around it)
I can see components when moving or dragging, but when i select a group of components (draw around them to select them) and move, it just shows the rectangle i drew around them
Yeh I dunno what happened to the guy who used to release the osx binaries. it can be compiled on osx ad the binaries can be shared around though, if any mac users try it please let us know!
Huh? just select them all, after you click ‘add’. In windows you can click the first .lib file, and hold shift and click the last, or just hit CTRL+A… I’m sure unix has a way to select multiple files as well
Oval is what I went with, the difference is just rounded edges so it’s largely cosmetic.. I do like the octagon though! Maybe time for a feature request…
True, it ain’t perfect… Good though, and for free it’s kickass!
this is great, ive been struggling with this same idea (core pcb for hombrew) over the last couple of weeks while trying to get my project off the ground. time as always has conspired against me.
however since im oversea’s atm for a couple of months that idea went the way of the dodo.
Gotta love the 1-click 3D images… It seems like a toy but damn it’s handy! It’s like an onscreen prototype. Of course Eagle3D can do it but there are a few more steps…
Many DIL-40 sockets have a brace across the middle (ie, between pins 10/11 and pins 30/31).
The resistor placed there might be a slight issue… if it moves over a little, and/or increases in length a little, then you’d be running the resistor lead under the brace, which should be ok.
Mind you, making the package longer means fewer of those lovely 0.005% links :
Right call there tilt, i am really worried about the lack of the 0.0005 cuties… i know that Wilba will organize a bulk order though, mmm should be wikified
I hope i can go to Copenhagen some day and get a few components so that i can test the board at least on paper, i moved some of them so it needs to be verified..
I do hope you guys keep an eye on this thread and help me to spot possible errors, i have to admit i am having fun with it and i may go on with the rest of MIDIBox boards.
Simone
EDIT:
Stryd: can you spot the 1n4148 footprint on the default kicad library? as you see i am using a longer one atm