OK. I hold my hand up - I went and looked, then looked at the price. Now, having had a nice cup of coffee with a shot of brandy I can say yes - way cool, and they should be at that price!
On a serious note, they do look very interesting, but I’m in the UK, which is perhaps why I hadn’t heard of them.
On the ‘stretch the budget till it squeaks’ line, I could perhaps afford a pair of Dynaudio BM6A’s, though for now, it’s going to be some cheapish nearfields that will reflect typical target systems, and some decent cans for the monitoring/QA.
When there isn’t a law or rule of physics to suit a situation, I used to have ‘Smiths Rule’, (there were lots of them), friends changed this to ‘Profs Rule’, and one, invented long ago was: Headphones to speakers is about a 10:1 cost ratio: a £100 pair of cans will sound as good as a £1000 pair of speakers. Like all rules, it tends to break down at the limits. Somewhere, no doubt, are a pair of handcrafted audiophile headphones, with pure unobtainium diaphragms, oxygen free monomolecular silver cables, assembled in pure. still air conditions by virginal Japanese maidens, only available to customers who have crawled to the dealers on their hands and knees and costing more than a pair of Genelec 1036A’s… but if you want these, then I can sell you a very good bridge to listen on, and Stryd might just be able to find you a tiny quantity of esoteric ear lubricant distilled from rare Australian snakes.
The CAT 5 cable idea seems to be catching on for small units - I’ve heard one or two references, before. I personally like the idea of having the amps near or built in to the speakers, getting rid of the cable as much as possible.
On a minor audiophile kick, I’ve been looking at a few of the on-line headphone amp designs. All look cheap enough to build, so I might have a little fun auditioning some of them.
Mike
.