I use ini2syx method of programming banks which works as before so I guess this means the sysex structure is same/compatable. So I would say vMidibox will work also.
Sure, the MIOS based MIDIbox64 it is compatible with Serge’s vmidibox64 editor (but note that the transfer rate has to be changed, see ChangeLog!)
Bosone: No, I see no way to adapt MIOS and the MB64 application to the expired MIDIbox Plus hardware - the maintenance and documentation effort would be too high and some applications would have to take care for the different pinout.
It would be much easier if you would just make your board MBHP compatible!
according to your experience, is it difficult to adapt the old midibox16 hardware to the MIOS? (i mean… other that the PIC and the quartz, what else is to change?)
Is a documentation really necessary? Just compare the two schematics, you have to solder the LCD and the 4051 select lines to other pins, you have to add a 10k pull-up to pin RC2 and RD1, and a 1k pull-up to RA4 (if it isn’t there yet). Thereafter MIOS should boot properly
if you promise that you will write a report about the integration for the MIDIbox portal and send it to Poeloq until the 1st November, I will give you some step by step instructions
mb64 2.0 sounds pretty cool. what are the possibilies of implementing multiple pages of buttons/leds changable via sfb?i’m really interested in this possibility and am willing to test. what do ya think TK?
Maybe sooner or later - but currently I’ve other priorities… so if somebody with programming skills feel interested: the changes have to be made in mb64_buttons.inc and mb64_leds.inc. The easiest way would be to switch between different DIN and DOUT maps depending on the state of a dedicated DIN.
you have to add a 10k pull-up to pin RC2 and RD1, and a 1k pull-up to RA4 (if it isn’t there yet)
I am updating my old MB64 to MIOS standard, I am using Greg’s PCB. (Built it in 2001) Concerning the pull up to RC2 - on the current core schematic, the pull up appears to go to RC3, and not RC2 as TK mentioned above. Have I got this correct?