Maybe this software uses a different (undocumented) format…
IT SHOULDN’T! I’m KNOW that You build MM emulation on those specs found from internet. (Even that You did it in that short notice)
(Well, You told that SX’s implementation of Mackie/Logic control is broken.. But THE Pro Tools??
Bye, Moebius
from the thread “Re: Module connection for Mackie Clone”
I guess that the only change is the device ID, which is 0x10 for Logic Control, and 0x14 for Mackie Control. The emulation ID can be defined in main.asm of the MIDIbox LC application.
If there are any other differences, we should always be able to add this to the firmware. Remember the Sonar fix - I found the required extension within 10 minutes by testing the MIDIbox LC with a demo version of Sonar. So - there is no real danger
Best Regards, Thorsten.
Maybe controlling protools with the logic control protocol would be better than CM motormix?
(go to a music store that sells the mackie control and ask to play with protools with it! 
Try before you build! ;))
But I don’t really know, and I’m not knowledgeable enough to do what TK is suggesting either. I guess I’m just pondering! I too wanted to buld a midibox for protools, but I can’t afford to buy protools, and windows XP to be able to run it!
The way Mackie control is running with pro tools is via the HUI protocol which we cannot get. I will work on checking the sysex string Thorston.