Jaicen,
Yeah, the Akai did sound like samples (but rather “sharp” ones).
I had an HR-16 too. I’d be surprised if it wasn’t as rare as the Akai now. That thing was built like a giant version of a cheap plastic calculator. The body of mine ended up breaking at the screw joints, causing the PCB button pads to “lift” from the board and ruin their accuracy. I think this was actually done by it’s previous owner. I called Alesis, and the tech asked for my address and shipped me out a new plastic body within a few days, free of charge. I always liked some of it’s sounds. My SR-16 is supposed to have some, but they never quite sounded the same. It’s also got sort of a crappy “tinny” sound, like it has that “smiley face” consumer-appeal EQ curve on it. I’ve wondered if any of their stuff might have the ability to split a digital signal to either a S/PDIF output, or to an additional chip, which could convert it to one. They’ve got some of the common Alesis-branded DAC chips you see mentioned places.
The crazy workarounds back then were pretty educational, and as I mentioned, that had a very “unique” overall sound to them. Fortunately, it didn’t last too long. The Roland 330/550 stuff arrived after a few years, giving me the ability to run live multi-output sample sequences, synced to FSK/SPP, and also had a mouse/CGA hookup, which was a bit ahead of it’s time. The Ensoniq EPS stuff showed up later and brought the whole market way down in price, with lots more features.
You want to feel sorry for people- All the local guys I dealt with for rap production were afraid of real samplers, all the way into the end of the EPS16+ line. While I was on the 550 ,they actually used DigiTech delays with a few seconds of memory available for a single sample location. They used to add DigiTechs to get multiple samples, and I think they either only triggered from the click/pulse output on the 909’s and stuff, or only on certain “short” voices. They would chain drum machines and crap to get more DigiTechs running simultaneously, manually trigger extra sample loops on each measure during the live mix to tape, or land things on 4-track and restart additional free-running sequences for the next pass. Their fear of the technology cost them about ten times what a 550 or Akai 900/950 may have run them. I usually had to accompany people to local studios, just to bring in their sample mixes and stuff I had no part in creating. Otherwise, they went to the more expensive “sampler equipped” studios and paid a fortune to sit around ripping vinyl into loops before the real session started.
For a while, I was the only one in that genre of music here with a real machine, and most of them had way more money for it than me. There was good sample gear here, used by a couple composers and commercial studios, and a local friend doing R&B stuff, kept up with it more than I did, but he didn’t deal with the same people. I fought my ass off trying to get those guys to buy “real” gear, with floppies and all, but they refused. The Akai’s were already common a couple states up the coast, but I guess we were “slow” here. Only a couple years later, one or two of them got EPS16+'s and MPC’s, and all of the sudden, they were everywhere . I was partners with a guy a few years ago, where we had the ASR-10, a Korg Trinity, an MPC60II, and some “limited edition” SP12 with a brass nameplate on it. Everything in there was maxxed out “memory/option-wise”, and he didn’t even know how to use most of it, and didn’t bother keeping most of the manuals. The computer & recording half of the place was even worse. - nice town huh?
Sorry for the nostalgic rambling ;D,
George